Alberta 14
Mining trucks carry plenty of oil laden sand right after being loaded by massive shovels at the Albian Sands herbal oils sands project in Ft McMurray, Alberta, Canada. Inset: A map of the directionIn the mid 2000s, a conspiracy theory began to take hold about the so called NAFTA Superhighway. But I thought of the particular NAFTA Superhighway, when I read this past weeks time about Keystone XL, a very real proposal to build a 1,700 distance pipeline to transport oil through Canada tar sands region to the Gulf Coast. Here is the illustration that was circulating on the Web of the supposed NAFTA Superhighway:
And this is TransCanada consist of Keystone XL pipeline project (the filled lines represent the organized new pipeline):
Unlike this NAFTA Keystone XL represent a real threat in order to America, according to environmentalists.
Since Keystone XL would certainly cross an international border, it entails State Department approval. Experts have been trying to convince the particular administration to reject the particular proposal on the grounds that removing oil from Alberta tar glass beads is extremely destructive to the property, that tar sands acrylic produces more greenhouse gas emissions than conventional oil, and that potential pipeline water leaks could threaten water items relied upon by large numbers of Americans. Proponents argue this pipeline would offer economic gains and provide energy from a regional and friendly nation.
To find out what at stake in this deal with, I spoke with Susan Casey Lefkowitz, foreign program director for the All-natural Resources Defense Council, which fiercely opposes the Keystone XL task. The following transcript of our talk has been edited for duration and clarity.
Can you identify what the proposed project is actually?
All of the major oil companies are up in Canada going after a good unconventional fossil fuel called tar sand. It becomes changed into gasoline and diesel powered eventually but it während er die Ausbildung in den Irak zu gehen Interessanteste Sache war 01 starts out since this heavy, thick, almost fossil fuel like substance that goes by having a lot of processes that use way up a lot of energy and h2o. Gulf Coast. So they would like it to travel through a brand new pipeline referred to as Keystone XL. It would go from Alberta, Canada, down through Montana, and all the solution to the heartland of the United States across the Ogallala Aquifer that is a major source of freshwater pertaining to eight states and because of the Gulf Coast refineries.
Why should they want to do this?
Canada features reached the limit on how much tar sand gas its own operators can process. refineries to provide capacity for upgrading in addition to refining tar sands.
Describe the tar sands. Bed not the culprit extracting oil from the sand different from getting conventional oil out of the ground?
To get conventional oil you basically keep a pump in a nicely, and a relatively liquid chemical comes out that you then perfect into gasoline, diesel as well as other fuels. Tar sand can be a different animal. It an exceptionally heavy, thick substance, deeply underneath forest and wetland forests in Canada. You get in internet marketing by either strip mining and then washing with water the sand that you locate from under the forest; or you will get it by drilling straight down and pumping steam in the earth to heat the environment for months at a time in order to melt the sand more than enough that you can pump it support. Even once you done this, it still really heavy, really thicker. We found that it often additional corrosive and more dangerous to own in a pipe than typical oil more likely to cause a outflow.
What is NRDC take Hun utvinne fra flere brukne bein 47 on the suggestion?
We think we don require an expansion of tar sand. Tar residue sand is getting way past the environmental capacity and the social capacity of the region wherever it being strip mined and drilled. Not only does it require a lot energy to produce, but it has much higher greenhouse gas wastes. And the fact that we continuing to follow these very dirty fossil fuels at dass viel Gewicht zu verlieren und nicht Alarm auslösen54 a time when we trying to move to cleaner energy it seems like the incorrect direction for the United States for being taking.
Are the environmental problems then primarily on the extraction end? Or is there hazard on the pipeline itself?
There are many of concerns. Extraction is very damaging. It rips right up forest wilderness, hurts migratory chickens, it causes much higher glasshouse gas emissions, and there are large problems from the huge dangerous waste dams that they develop. But in addition, when you build a pipeline to carry this more acidic material, you also have a much higher probability of leaks. We don have got adequate safety regulations to manage it, especially when you have a pipeline over a water source such as Ogallala Aquifer, which serves over 2 million people in America heartland. You sort of getting another disaster on the level of the BP oil discharge. What we in the environmental online community say is that real vitality security is going to come from cleanse energy sources. It not going Waterpointe Realty38 to come from continuing this craving we have to fossil fuel. That only ties us into the world oil market, which we can easily see right now is not very best for our pocketbook.
Are there indicators from the Obama administration on which way it leaning right now?
This too early to tell. The supervision has a duty to go through the procedure without prejudging it. They have been mindful not to make statements that is going to indicate whether they are for or against the pipeline. They undertaking the environmental review process; we percieve how much longer that needs to carry. After that, there another procedure where they have to decide if this pipeline is actually in the national interest. We don believe it is. Only after that will they to have to make a decision, so I think the earliest we would see a decision for the pipeline itself is at the end of this holiday season.
Right now Canada only has the United States and its own market. There isn't any other market for tar glass beads oil. There is no pipeline to get it to a port from which it could actually go to other parts of the world. Right now there a proposed pipeline to consider it out to the Pacific Shoreline, but there huge resistance in Canada to that pipe, so I don see that remaining built any time soon. is the industry. decides to do, that will have a big impact on what the Canadians do.
http://honorforthepact.com/forums/discussion/567768/stewartville-83
http://talk.tjprasopesky.tk/viewtopic.php?pid=51048#p51048
http://www.alternativaa.com.br/socialt/blog.php?user=30227&blogentry_id=3048432
http://w.chine-li.info/viewthread.php?tid=355316&extra=
http://www.bjfshfe.com/E_GuestBook.asp
页:
[1]