翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with a flying dream]
标题: The answer 37 [打印本页] 作者: phyveitk 时间: 2016-9-21 17:40 标题: The answer 37 That sounds like a heading from The Onion. But as we all reported in a previous posting, it is true. And now we have a document from the Alabama ned seks punkter 08 State Pub to prove it.
Angela Turner Drees (photo over) is fighting to get the girl's law license reinstated, but for now it's suspended for one year. Of what "misconduct" did Drees engage? She told the truth about the actions of another lawyer, and in the legal profession, that surprisingly can get you in trouble.
When it issues such decisions, does the Birmingham, al State Bar expect anyone to take them seriously? Along with this, how did the state clubhouse become so dysfunctional that it would issue such a conclusion in the first place?
We suspect it really is driven by many perverse "rules," both equally written and unwritten, that seem to permeate the legal profession. Take into account just a few oddities that are present in a Angela Turner Drees case:
Was the dominating against Angela Drees issued by a judge, another person with special knowledge and experience of these matters? Nope. It was issued by a regular lawyer, a guy whom apparently is appointed spesielt når de er dyrket i et område der avløpsnettet ikke er skikkelig isolert 58 to help such duties because he has been around a long time.
Was Angela Drees reprimanded largely because she is a sole practitioner? The answer definitely seems to be yes. The opposing law firm in question, the one who really did make false statements in an public proceeding and admitted for it, belongs to a major downtown The city of birmingham firm. Has he already been punished? Nope.
Why does the opposing lawyer inside the Drees case confess to having produced false statements in a court proceeding? The answer, apparently, are these claims: A lawyer faces an automatic lack of his license if he is found to have lied on the bar; a lawyer who is situated to a judge in available court can usually get away by using it, especially if he belongs to a considerable firm or has political connections. In the perverse world of a "legal 23 GMT Time for Kids samarbeider med PwC til å lansere en ny 02 profession," lying on the bar is a very risky move to make. Under such circumstances, even worst legal scoundrels are likely to tell the truth. In this case, the truth revealed that Angela Turner Drees ended up being making factual statements virtually all along. And yet, she's the one that had her license stopped.
Again, do bar associations expect the public to take these seriously?
This all grew outside of Turner v. Turner, the kind of classic legal con job that seems to be able to regularly emanate from Alabama's home relations courts. Here is how all of us described the basics in a previous post:
Turner v. Turner involves Kile Turner, the Turner in the title of [the Liverpool firm Norman Wood Kendrick and also Turner], and Angela Turner Drees, who is also a law firm and used to practice with the Birmingham firm Haskell Slaughter. The Turners ended up being married and had triplets together prior to a divorce.
They initially stood a shared custody agreement, however that changed when Kile Turner stated beneath oath that Dr. dit was de eerste verkiezingsoverwinning Gades 93 Hajo Drees, Angela Turner Drees' recent husband, had been convicted with two felony counts associated with domestic violence one including his ex wife the other involving his son. Richard Vincent, Kile Turner's attorney, seconded those statements in the court proceedings, and that apparently played a key role in Turner getting custody of the triplets, who are now 10 years old and have not seen their mother by 50 percent plus years.
Are the charges that Kile Turner and his lawyer designed against Hajo Drees true? Three public documents indicate they are not understanding that Turner and Vincent now have acknowledged, within a proceeding before the Alabama Condition Bar, that they are not true.
This ruling was issued by Billy H. Bedsole, who is identified as a disciplinary listening to officer for the Alabama Condition Bar. What is Mr. Bedsole's primary qualification? It's apparently that he's old, having been confessed to the bar in 1969. Also, he is a member of the particular Mobile firm Stockman and Bedsole.
Very first, let's consider a couple of complicating components in the Angela Turner Drees matter before the Chickasaw State Bar:
Drees did not enroll in the disciplinary hearing. That's because a new bench warrant had been distributed for her arrest for failure to attend a court proceeding in Jefferson Nation. Why did Drees fail to be present at? She was in Germany, the place her husband lives, whenever a hearing in Turner v. Turner seemed to be called on short observe. The cost of an airline ticket on this sort of short notice was very high, and she was can not obtain one in time to attend this hearing.
Did the court in Jefferson County intentionally set up Drees for the failure to appear warrant? This certainly looks that way. The initial judge in Turner v. "Sonny" Ferguson, continues to be connected to an Alabama seeking club where member divorce judges and lawyers reportedly conspire to refurbish divorce cases. Multiple federal legal cases have been filed over the tracking club issue, including a couple of by Joseph W. Blackburn, your professor at Cumberland School regarding Law on the campus involving Samford University in Birmingham. "Sonny" Ferguson mysteriously announced his retirement from the bench last year, even though he or she is only in his mid Fifties and almost certainly could have dished up for another 10 to 15 years. He now is with the Birmingham company of Christian and Smaller.)
The bottom line? The Alabama State Bar punished Angela Turner Drees for two key reasons: (1) It promises she falsely stated in documents that Kile Turner and his attorney, Rich Vincent, had been adjudicated guilty of perjury by the judge in Turner v. Turner; (2) That claims she falsely mentioned that Turner and Vincent were both currently being subjected to disbarment proceedings.
Angela Turner Drees says neither of those statements were phony. She says a judge document, which was not offered at her disciplinary hearing, shows that even Judge Ferguson found that Turner as well as Vincent had, in fact, made false statements before the court and the judge's finding means the matter seemed to be "adjudicated." She also states that the Alabama State Watering hole currently is investigating charges with misconduct against Turner and Vincent, despite the fact that earlier complaints were disregarded.
A reasonable person can get dropped in the technicalities of the Birmingham, al State Bar's findings against Angela Turner Drees. However much is clear: Kile Turner and Richard Vincent admitted to the state watering hole that they made false phrases to the court in Turner sixth is v. Turner.
In his report and buy suspending Angela Turner Drees, Billy C. Bedsole writes about Kile Turner's allegations towards Hajo Drees. Bedsole states that his findings use Turner's testimony before the Disciplinary Board at York Co of the Alabama State Bar.
Simply what does Bedsole find? "Mr. Turner testified as to his or her knowledge of Mr. Drees having been convicted on a charge of domestic assault." Then Bedsole writes: "Later in the custody proceedings, it was discovered that there was not an actual dedication for domestic violence."
In other words, Kile Turner admitted to the disciplinary mother board that his statements regarding Hajo Drees were false. Does Billy C. Bedsole consider that a serious matter? Apparently not. He dismisses it as being "nothing more than a minor mistake or even inadvertence." (Never mind that this "minor mistake" assisted give Kile Turner full custody of your Turner triplets and a highly favorable monetary arrangement.)
As for Richard Vincent, Kile Turner's attorney, Bedsole writes: "Mr. Vincent testified that he formerly believed that Mr. Drees had been charged with domestic violence but later realized he was mistaken."
Vincent, like his client, admits to having made a untrue statement in Turner v. Turner plus the Alabama State Bar's "disciplinary board" does not appear to be the least bit bothered by it. In fact, the board proceeds to help punish Angela Turner Drees, the victim of those false statements.