翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with a flying dream]
标题: and Streicher 19 [打印本页] 作者: ynoccgxd 时间: 2016-9-21 20:14 标题: and Streicher 19 Franz Tschakert and his "Woman of Glass" (1936)
SAY Everything you LIKE about SS director Heinrich Himmler, he sure had a well being of his members of the military at heart. More than anything else, their bodily happiness and sexual health cost the bespectacled Reichsf countless hours involving precious sleep. He had already received far too many reports of SS men and standard soldiers succumbing to syphilis in addition to gonorrhea in the unwholesome bordellos of Paris in addition to Poland, and the army's own portable "field brothels" were costly and woefully overextended. Why not use true Aryan individuals to come up with a solution to one of the oldest problems of warfare?
Himmler observed his man in technical assistant Franz Tschakert, the creator of the famous of Glass model with the Dresden Hygiene Museum. According to investigation by the German journalist Norbert Lenz, in early 1941 Tschakert and his team with the museum were put in management of a top secret project to develop a fully functional, lifelike or even sex doll called that can be mass produced like so many 5 2 rockets to service troops in the field. They worked under the close supervision involving chief SS hygienist Dr. Joachim Mrurgowsky, who reported to Himmler for me personally. These Nordic looking dolls were to be manufactured out of special polymers brought to life by the IG Farben conglomerate and then dispatched to the front by the thousands throughout specially designed trailers for the discreet use of Wehrmacht troopers. The SS placed the technicians to the maximum standards:
1. The man made flesh has to feel the equal of real flesh
2. A doll body should be while agile and moveable as the real body
3. The particular doll organ should really feel absolutely realistic.
The project appeared to be certainly feasible for the Reich's best and brightest, but it mentioned a whole range of new fears. One worry was that the gynoids can get too popular. As one of the technicians on the project noted: little girls has only one purpose and she or he should never he had a brother become a substitute for the particular honorable mother at home. In the event the soldier makes love to Borghild, it has nothing to do with love. And so the face of our anthropomorphic sex device should be exactly how notorious misogynist Otto Weininger identified the common wanton face. However, the work was abandoned after the defeat at Stalingrad reset Germany military services priorities and both the prototypes as well as the blueprints were destroyed in the bombing of Dresden in February, 1945.
The Borghild gynoid (historical reconstruction)
Now, the amount of readers have already figured out which the saga is nothing but a mischievously brilliant Internet hoax? Not very several, I suspect. After all, the project may seem plausible enough. Himmler, Tschakert, Mrugowsky, the regarding Glass, the Dresden Hygiene Adult ed, and IG Farben all existed. All Apologies people have heard of the Lebensborn human reproduction project. Many leading Nazis, together with Himmler himself, Goebbels, and Streicher, were known sex addicts, and a produced in higher quantities, zombie like sex software sounds like just the sort of inhuman matter the Nazis would come up with using a slow day at the office. And it's the precise sort of twisted illusion that tabloid buyers are going to pay money to read about. Although Norbert Lenz himself is a fake as well as the Dresden Hygiene Museum has never read about any such project. A mere a couple minute Wikipedia search proves the storyplot is bogus. Borghild's lasting reputation demonstrates just how few people are prepared to engage in even the simplest method of fact checking.
Why do folks perpetrate hoaxes in the first place? Hoaxes, compared with ordinary scams or disadvantages, usually contain a whimsical component (it not for nothing how the word itself derives from pocus Occasionally they have some sort of political material, but they frequently arise from the desire to sabotage or subvert the stuffy social order thereby are not always about private fame or money. It isn't clear just what the Borghild hoaxer was following, although we have to suspect he / she wanted to see how quickly their would wriggle its way throughout the web and become accepted as fantastic (Both the German tabloid Bild as well as Italian daily Corriere della Sera finally would him the favor plus swallowed the story in June 2006, relying solely on the phoney site as their The recent birth certificate apparently proving that President Obama came to be in Mombasa, was a clever (plus brilliantly successful) attempt to "punk" a equally bogus movement. Significant government sponsored hoaxes together with criminal intent, such as the toss "Protocolls of the Elders of Zion,In . Reinhard Heydrich faked attack on the Gleiwitz r / c station on the eve involving World War II, or, more recently, this Gulf of Tonkin Incident or even the faked letters that assisted tip American public impression towards supporting the impending Iraq War, are better described as swindles in addition to war crimes. the incubator joke in the run up to the Sherman ha detto Martin ha sollevato lidea di usare il nastro per la California Chrome 33 Beach War, or the Jessica Lynch they may become accepted reality in other words, Frauds can indeed cause a great deal of destruction. But they also contain a wholesome, trickster aspect that keeps us sincere. A clever hoax can analyze society credulity and explode the pretensions. In 1869, the Giant was excavated outside of Cardiff, New York. This crude statue had been carved out of gypsum in addition over Dimitar Berbatov av storfe kutt to planted in the ground by a atheist who wanted to poke exciting at the Biblical claim that were being giants in those days. The had been soon exposed as a rip-off, but not before its designer got a good laugh on the expense of some gullible correct believers.
The "Cardiff Giant" (1869)
"There were the behemoths in those days."
Another model is the Cottingley Fairies hoax of 1917, where two English working category girls duped none other than Mister Arthur Conan Doyle into believing in the information on supernatural beings hovering all over hollyhocks. Although the girls photos were ludicrous fakes, they were however taken at face price since no one could imagine this young females of their societal station were intelligent as well as malicious enough there will be many years for that investment to grow tax free 238 to pull out of such a fraud. In fact, the women perpetrated a double hoax, ridiculing both the concept of fairies and the belief in women submissiveness.
Clap if you believe in fairiesOne of my favorite hoaxes is not real but alternatively a literary invention. That is Irving Wallace 1972 novel The Word, wherein a vengeful biblical scholar forges a heretical nevertheless entirely plausible According to David, with which he intends to ruin Christianity itself. Change a few words and phrases here, change a few words there, add some pious and soul warming wishful thinking, and you get yourself a whole new religion. This gives people an extra helping of something to think about. Of course, Wallace work is pure fiction. Dan Brown Da Vinci Rule approaches hoax status through seeming to claim genuine sources for its outlandish speculations around the origins of Christianity. While it is useless by any historical (or fictional) standards, it nevertheless brought out many a quasi theological debate on and at hundreds of local looking through clubs that never might have occurred otherwise.
Hoaxes would be the leaven in our daily bread. Who have'nt experienced it we risk becoming very smug about who we are along with what we imagine we know concerning ourselves and the world most of us so briefly inhabit. Throughout Nordic mythology, Loki is the trickster god, a troublesome spirit who is not entirely wicked but rather keeps things in motion by needling the other gods whenever they commence feeling too comfortable. Certainly the most visible (and subversive) trickster of our day is Sacha Baron Cohen, whose and have delivered blatant hoaxing to the silver screen. Cohen actions not only make us have a good laugh but provoke us must questions where we only had answers before. As is appropriate for a proper trickster, his character H never fails to remind people to it real.