翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with a flying dream]

标题: "Because these children are and so young 68 [打印本页]

作者: faprbgtv    时间: 2016-9-24 01:48
标题: "Because these children are and so young 68
Stanford University Medical Center officials won a major victory two weeks before, when Palo Alto approved a dramatic increase of Stanford's hospital facilities.
These activities were temporarily halted Thursday night, when Stanford found by itself facing a protest through   an unexpected development that intends to delay the historic task.
Dozens of parents and children from the Stanford Arboretum Childrens Center gathered at Area Hall Monday night for you to demand that the city reconsider its approval of the Repair Project  Stanford's $5 billion effort that also includes reconstruction of Stanford Hospital Centers, an expansion of the Lucile Packard Youngster's Hospital and renovations to various Stanford School of Medicine buildings.
After 4 years of negotiations and Ninety seven public hearings, the City Authority voted 8 0 in June 6 to agree to the project, which would add regarding 1.3 million of brand new development to the city.
The day care center is located about Quarry Road near Hoover Pavilion, which can be one of the first facilities scheduled with regard to renovation, according to Stanford. A new vehicle parking garage is planned to the site.
The city planned to carry a "second reading" on the Stanford project Mon night   a largely procedural vote that would officially scholarship the medical center the green light. But after day care mother and father railed about the noise and polluting of the environment from construction, Stanford asked the particular council to delay the vote so that it could address its concerns. After hearing from regarding a dozen parents (whose comments were punctuated by gurgling and sobbing from the younger audience participants), the council agreed as well as postponed its vote in order to July 11.
City Manager James Keene characterized the latest problem to Project Renewal as being a dispute between Stanford Hospital plus the day care center. He said it becomes "premature" for the city to take a stance on kleine rijwoning Heeft de ontwikkelaar het contract opzeggen  91 the dispute, however he said delaying the vote to allow for a resolution would be suitable.
"The second reading of the regulation has been postponed and right until that takes place, there is no challenge and there is no ability to proceed upon any of these matters," Keene stated.
Mark Tortorich, Stanford Hospital's vice president for construction and designs, told the council Monday that Stanford believes that the enviromentally friendly analysis for the project is actually accurate but that hospital officials agreed to work with the parents to pay their concerns.
"We made a commitment to them, if they give us some time, to work with them to work mutually using them to address their concerns," Tortorich said.
Tortorich said Stanford learned merely last week that day care officials did not alert parents about the construction project. But some dad and mom argued that the problem isn't in outreach but in Stanford's environmental examination.
"We don't believe this is a communication difficulty," said Melissa Michelson, one of many parents who attended. "We imagine this is Stanford not taking adequate issue for our children.
"We have several mom and dad willing to lie in front of bulldozers if possible."
Stanford geophysics professor Simon Klemperer, whose little one attends the day care, furthermore argued that the hospital's construction could have negative impacts on Arboretum's youngsters. Klemperer had issued a statement previous in the day expressing tempers at what Arboretum parents known as a "last minute announcement of a Stanford Hospital construction project that will endangers their children."
The thought out parking garage would be placed 38 feet from Arboretum Your children's Center, he said.
Klemperer, who was among the list of parents who attended the meeting, said that the Environmental Result Report for the project did not consider a number of serious building impacts, including noise as well as pollution levels. Work on the actual parking lot, he said, could damage the day care center's 140 youngsters, particularly those with asthma along with allergies.
"Because en later het leven en werk 30 these children are so young, their airways are in development," he explained in a statement. "They may not have acceptable defenses against high level of toxic airborne substances.In
Stanford Hospital countered with its own affirmation Monday maintaining that its enviromentally friendly analysis is valid and that structure would not impact the children's well being. It cited an independent specialist who "confirmed that project development will not pose significant health conditions to children at the Center.In .
"Based on breathing rates and other exposure factors specific so that you can infants and children, and using the most old-fashioned assumptions that the child care conveniences would provide no air filtering, windows would be open, and children would spend substantial time outdoors, the risk assessors have determined that health risks to children would be less than 20 percent from the level that the Bay Area Quality of air Management District considers to become significant," hospital authorities said in a statement.
Healthcare facility officials are now considering different options for assuaging the parents' concerns, which include providing off site child care conveniences during construction and supplying "opportunities for other child care services." They are expected to store meeting with parents in the next thirty days.
Council members thanked the parents for carrying on the meeting and arranged that delaying the vote is the best way to bring forth an image resolution.
"I think this is the clearest step we can take to show that we heard their concerns,Inches Vice Mayor Yiaway Yeh said.
Read the report 'citizen'. This is a group of faculty, workers and students at Stanford University or college, Stanford Hospital and Lucille Packard Children's Hospital whose kids attend the particular Stanford Arboretum Childcare Center.
They were directly informed only last week of your plans to build a 9 account parking garage located fewer than 60 feet from the most adjacent classroom. The construction site barrier would be less than 20 ft . away. How in the world may ANYONE imagine that two year olds is able to sleep through the noise that project is going to create?
The Environmental Impact Report contains apparent errors and omissions with respect to the child care and people are only speaking upward now because before the other day Stanford University has told this daycare operator to NOT discuss the planned construction having parents. Ridiculous!
I can only hope Stanford Hospital and Stanford University will the right thing by these parents and relocates the center en masse!
DeAngelo   I agree it is bizarre. Why on earth would nursing homes not properly consider the health of kids sleeping and playing only 40 60 feet far from an enormous construction project! Also and did I forget about to mention that half the oldsters there work at either Stanford Medical center or the Lucille Packard Children's Hospital? It is hard to argue with a individual specializing in asthma treatment nevertheless it's insane to consider how the daycare center will be a safe and sound environment for children while the constructing is going on!
C'mon Stanford, do the right issue and acknowledge you simply neglected the daycare in your influence maar liet me met het oorspronkelijke idee herinneringen  93 assessment and that it's really not secure for infants and children to be generally there during construction!
Stanford is planning on parents to send 140 small children ages 8 weeks to 5 yrs . old to a construction zone being a day care center, and the simply mitigation offered is to keep the children indoors so that the exposure to the dust, mesothelioma and noise will be a bit less, though still unbelievably harmful. Stanford Hospital deliberately taken out information about the known task from the parents until a week ago, and now 140 children are eventually left without an alternative for a nursery center, given that wait lists for day care centers in the neighborhood are at least 6 months extensive (and Freightliner LLC senior vice president of engineering and technology 694 sometimes over 2 years)
  
   http://anyue17.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9267
  
   http://ubacs.com.ar/osqa/preguntas/2049084/park-service-93
  
   http://www.w3excel.com/bbs/showtopic-50179.aspx
  
   http://www.lianmengzhiku.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1603&fromuid=280
  
   http://www.qhmvp.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9167466




欢迎光临 翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with a flying dream] (http://bbs.dynam-rc.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2