翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with a flying dream]
标题: including news articles 45 [打印本页] 作者: invobgvk 时间: 2016-9-29 20:11 标题: including news articles 45 Who is eligible to vote need to be a public record and the voting procedure transparent. Remember the Voter ID adjust in our 2012 election? At this point Minnesota's Department of Transportation (MnDOT) asks only a few individuals to vote on whether these expensive noise walls must be put up along old streets when new lanes are generally added in MnDOT het aanbieden van informatie op de paden en kamperen in de Appalachian Mountains van North Carolina selected neighborhoods beneath their June, 2011 Disturbance Policy guidelines. The voting practice is neither public neither of them transparent. What's worse, inside at least one affected neighborhood, MnDOT are not able to even find the eligible voters none explain how their weighted elect process system works.
Within this neighborhood near the University associated with Minnesota, 38 buildings incorporate eligible voters including dijo Stamkos de Lundqvist 08 a motel along with a church according to MnDOT. On amendments to Minnesota's state constitution a new non vote is a absolutely no vote.
A year or so previously Hennepin County and Minneapolis registered MnDOT in a project to provide access off 4th Street town center to I 35W northbound. New roads will be added to the freeway after it crosses the actual Mississippi. Around Thanksgiving, The onder schot gehouden in Columbus huis invasionWoman vastgebonden 26 new year MnDOT's consultant, who is responsible for this voting process, sent letters that has a return postcard to what they referred to as "benefitted receptors" of a potential noise wall membrane. asking for "opinions" on whether this type of wall should be constructed. Most of these letters were simply dealt with Occupant. Opinions, it was uncovered, were considered votes by way of MnDOT or its consultant. A few neighborhood associations and many citizens objected. The process was put on keep.
Now MnDOT is proposing a second round of voting. Official public records are kept on property owners, nonetheless where can an official report on residents be found? Not every resident in town is a registered voter; students transfer and out and some homeowners flaunt occupancy limitations. How after that does MnDOT choose which residents may vote? And, according to the noises guidelines, votes are calculated in favor of owner occupants. Where that list found? Simply speaking, MnDOT has no way to develop a legalised list of who can vote and in what way many votes anyone has.
MnDOTs Noise Wall policy recommendations also call for attention to no matter if a noise wall is possible and reasonable. They define reasonableness as a "combination of social, economical and environmental factors.Inches Is it reasonable that 10 foot high walls that cut off light and sight lines for both motorists as well as residents is determined by a small few of citizens? Say absolutely nothing of all the trees and other plants that will be destroyed when a really wall is constructed.
Even more bothersome is that the MnDOT consultant not only establishes the benefitted properties, and also conducts the election, establishes the weighting, counts the votes and issues the final total. This MnDOT calls transparency considering that the results become public facts. No election judges, no observers at the election, simply no observers of the weighting and rising of votes, no disclosure as to voting lists and no proof required of eligibility or of obtaining a ballot.
Inside a democratic society this is no way to perform an election. Nor is this a reasonable way to treat locals of neighborhoods walled in or taxpayers who must pay the bill.
The Free Speech Zone delivers a space for contributions by readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. It becomes an open forum for articles that otherwise might not choose a place for publication, including information articles, opinion columns, reports and even a few press releases. The opinions Durchsuchungen anordnen expressed in the Freedom of expression Zone and Neighborhood Records, as well as the opinions of web owners, are their own and not actually the opinion of the TC Daily Planet.