翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with a flying dream]
标题: In evidence 69 [打印本页] 作者: bibebfms 时间: 2016-10-10 23:00 标题: In evidence 69 Labor leader John Robertson exhibited an ''error of judgment'' by failing to report an attempted $3 million offer from late businessman Michael McGurk, an inquiry has found, possibly reigniting questions over his leadership.
The parliamentary inquiry into the sale setzen auf of the former un retreat Currawong at Pittwater found that the offer, made when Mr Robertson has been head of Unions NSW, should einem schwimmenden Wasserfall have been reported to be able to police and his own business.
NSW Treasurer Andrew Constance said a findings showed Mr Robertson ended up being "untrustworthy" but Mr Robertson said the issue ocurred "almost a decade ago" and he received zero benefit.
The inquiry was triggered by Mr Robertson's thought last year that he was provided a bribe in 2006 by means of standover man Mr McGurk, who was eventually shot dead. Mr McGurk wanted to buy Currawong for $30 million. The NSW Crimes Act requires you're not knowledge of an indictable offence to be able to report it to police force.
In evidence, Mr Robertson stated in hindsight that ''if I had time over again I would err on the side of caution and report it''.
The actual committee also found it seemed to be ''inappropriate'' that Mr Robertson met using Mr McGurk alone in 03 2006, when the attempted offer took place, and that he ''should have liked the potential repercussions'' of the dubious meeting.
It said there was no facts to de vidas programadas y padres agotados 48 suggest Mr Robertson ''received any financial gain or reward'' from the offer, although he displayed an error connected with judgment in failing to notify police and Unions NSW.
The report said Mister Robertson also failed to disclose the actual conversation once he became a Labor minister, during parliamentary deliberations during 2009. A bill being considered may have allowed the Independent Commission Against Corruption to hear audio tracks of conversations involving Mister McGurk which allegedly implicated mature NSW Labor identities.
Mr Robertson voted for the bill, which will passed. ICAC later found ideas over the tapes were devoid of substance.
The parliamentary inquiry looked at whether Mr Robertson should have expressed a conflict of interest in the event there was a chance he appeared to be recorded or mentioned in the tapes.
Mr Robertson did not believe that he was on the taping solutions, and argued ''if I had been nervous and I had a conflict, I would personally have voted completely and the votre bébé a dépendu de vous pour laider à se lever sur ses pieds second way''.
The inquiry found Mister Robertson did not contravene any parliamentary code regarding conduct. But it said the ''high standards of integrity'' required involving ministers meant it would have been ''reasonable plus prudent'' to have disclosed the incentivise offer to then top Nathan Rees and to Parliament.
It recommended discord of interest provisions in the Mega pixel code of conduct be examined, with a view for you to including current or former business dealings ''which have the potential for you to unduly influence a member's actions''.