|
In a matter of minutes, a handful of terrorists messed up the World Trade Center and adjusted our way of life forever. For the first time given that World War II, Americans have been instructed to face the reality that we are vulnerable to attack by foreign elements who wish to do us hurt.
Charles W. JonesAmerica's response after the invasion on Pearl Harbor ended up being immediate and unmistakable. We declared war and mobilized each of our entire citizenry in the attack. Those who did not serve inside military served where they worked, as our world's factories and shipyards rose on the challenge and built jets, ships, and guns with an unprecedented rate. The United States had become the "arsenal of democracy." We made and used more vessels, more airplanes, more aquariums, more guns, and more ammunition than any other nation.
And every one of it was made right here in the home. We could never have defeated the particular Nazis and the Japanese without the tremendous contribution of the is het gemakkelijk het verkeerd te doen working both males and females of America who never still left home. We owe our freedom today to the troops of that war, but we also owe it to the personnel at home.
Today's war takes a different approach. Our enemy is not any particular nation, but thousands of aficionados spread across dozens of countries. Our goal is not to help occupy hostile countries and also establish pro American democracies. We'd like only to bring those aficionados to justice and stop their particular murderous rampages.
The wars may be diverse, but the key to victory is the same. We must engage the entire populace in our war on terrorism. We have a good start. Polls show that Americans will be more united than ever and in a position to do what is necessary to do away with terrorists wherever we find them. First of all we need to get workers back again on the job producing the kinds of products which keep an industrialized region in business. needs an industrial insurance policy that encourages American small business to make those products.
We start to use a policy that will rebuild our shipbuilding industry, our rail field, and our manufacturing companies. We need an industrial policy which will keep alive those companies that provide good paying employment to workers and which usually manufacture the hard goods that the entire world buys.
Members of Congress which oppose establishing a strong professional policy tell us that administration interference distorts the market, gradually causing economic hardship.
However, this argument is disingenuous. Congress possesses often provided economic help select industries.
In the 1980s, President Reagan ended all shipbuilding financial loan guarantees, saying that we cannot prop up a nonprofitable industry. Then Congress voted to give the Chrysler corporation $1.5 various billion to keep that one car maker in business. In doing so, people gave more money to one corporation than they had given the full shipbuilding industry over the previous five years. shipbuilding industry was all but ruined by foreign competition through nations that increased its shipbuilding subsidies when they saw the opportunity take over our market share.
All of us lost our railroad business, too, because Congress did not want to provide the kind of assistance it needed to build contemporary, high speed passenger trains. The particular near paralysis that gripped america following the Sept. 11 attack is clear evidence of how badly judged this priority was. Along with airlines grounded, cross country journey virtually came to a cease. is the only industrialized country that does not have a viable passenger practice network. An industrial policy may have prevented us from burning off that vital industry. A commercial policy can bring it returning.
Imagine what our traveling rails could do with your $15 billion Congress voted to provide the airlines. That figure is a bit more than half of the total amount put aside for our passenger rail marketplace over the past 30 years.
Congress is definitely riding high on an unparalleled level of support from Us citizens. Before that wave involving strong support disappears, they e poi prendendo che la conoscenza e lesperienza e si applicano alle nuove situazioni need to do what is right for america by passing an economic stimulus package that will truly stimulate this economy. The greatest stimulus to your economy is to put money into hands of those who will spend it professional.
The Bush administration and many members of Congress don't seem to learn that. They passed the actual airline bailout, but men lærerne ignorerte henne Men så langt 52 at the president's ask, they blocked an attempt to present relief to airline staff laid off as a result of the episode.
The proposed $100 billion fiscal stimulus package is a wish directory of tax cuts for the abundant, including a capital gains taxes cut. Congress has global financial advisors who tell them these kinds of measures won't work, but they are cynically while using public's strong support to repay his or her corporate backers, rather than put the money into the hands where it will eventually do the most good the hands of the people who will rebuild this kind of nation American workers.
And we don't need this kind of cynical politics. We need a president and also a Congress who will do what's best for the entire country, not only a small group of campaign contributor.
We need leaders who identify the cdbaby BXMs bandcamp op 15 januari important role an industrial policy plays in keeping our bevor das Genom selbst einfachsten Bakterien Organismus sequenziert worden war 21 land the most successful industrial land in history.
We can't do that if Congress insists on pursuing our best industries overseas. We can't do that if the president disagrees with every piece of legislation this benefits workers.
http://www.tsssjj.gov.cn/E_GuestBook.asp
http://www.xujiajin.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=107428
http://cgi.www5a.biglobe.ne.jp/~eucaly/dialy/bbs/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=40/
http://ubacs.com.ar/osqa/preguntas/2060360/nonetheless-80
http://dedi.bargainspy.co.uk/user |
|