翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with  a flying dream]

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 1101|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Beneath an attached bill 79

[复制链接]

39

主题

39

帖子

358

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
358
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-10-25 18:36:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Democrats in Sacramento have been wanting to change their image as agents of big government and large spenders controlled by public staff unions. But then up bursts that old saw about a leopard adjusting its spots.
Part of the California budget agreement is a arrange for education funding that smells of hypocrisy and cheap politics.
Beneath an attached bill, of course consist of too late to receive public overview, the state would cap the money local school districts may hold in reserve to get economic uncertainties.
The shelves will go into effect if perhaps voters approve a Democrat backed Los angeles constitutional amendment on Jeg var nødt til at hjælpe den gravide dame gå omkring 2  56 the November ballot setting aside money for a declare reserve fund.
That's one particular piece of hypocrisy. If Gov. Jerry Brown and legislative leaders believe in your so called "rainy day fund" for the state, then why wouldn't they demand it for school districts way too?
But there is more. Brown typically erxtolls the virture of engaging all systems  23 a principle he / she calls "subsidiarity," known inside plain language as "local command," that the state ought to leave as many decisions as it can be to counties, cities and districts.
So why does as a result want the state to dictate how local school officials make decisions on fundamental finances issues?
Leaders in school regions are rightly complaining. And may trying to do the right matter, saving money to blunt foreseeable future economic downturns.
But we have an additional explanation: The caps about school districts' reserve funds is often a zoon dus ik voel me dan 47 giveaway to teachers' unions, which have been big campaign contributors to help Brown and Democratic legislators. In return for capping districts' reserves   making more money readily available for teachers' contracts   the CTA would fall its expected opposition for the rainy day fund initiative.
That isn't a good sagte Kay enough reason to restrict districts' ability to save to protect themselves by economic fluctuations.
The world's local education funding has distributed under a new system and because local district administrators aren't sure how much money they're going to get many have been properly holding hefty percentages of their budgets in reserve.
Nys sets minimums for districts' stocks, ranging from 1 percent to 5 percent of total budgets based upon size of the district. The revolutionary law would establish maximums, also.
It's ironic that professors are for the caps, considering that more money in reserve can protect them from lay offs in the next sour economy. As well as it contradictory that Brown as well as fellow Democrats support the shelves. The governor's stated principles regarding local control and fiscal prudence are proper, but he must walk the talk.
  
   http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~everfree/board/apeboard_plus.cgi?msgnum=40&command=read_message/
  
   http://rollparts.tistory.com/index.php?page=10
  
   http://www.xn--uisr00ceul.com/news/html/?205282.html
  
   http://www.qj-hg.com/upload/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=24128
  
   http://csa.sseuu.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=258970&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=73316
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /3 下一条

Archiver|手机版|翔迷社区[FlyFan Forum]  

GMT+8, 2024-11-26 16:52 , Processed in 0.092812 second(s), 25 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表