翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with  a flying dream]

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 795|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

As I write this week's Watch 78

[复制链接]

35

主题

35

帖子

266

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
266
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-9-13 20:00:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
This week's View continues it has the analysis of h2g2's progress during processing entries for the Customized Guide, and looks at techniques to make the h2g2 staffers happy.
This Week's Perspective
As I write this week's Watch, there are 340 entries still left in the old queue. That's down from 378 entries a week ago, which often totals a reduction of Thirty eight. This pace has remained essentially unchanged for the past month or so.
Researchers have submitted 361 entries towards the new Peer Review practice so far, compared to 311 last week. And you will find 24 entries on the Precisely what is Coming Up page, up coming from 17 last week.
The total amount of entries submitted for review to both the old program and the new Peer Critique is 651, which shows minimal change overall since this column started. But in a sense, absolutely no news is good news. In advance of Peer Review was launched, the number of entries waiting for evaluation was rising steadily. At this moment things are levelling off, and this impulses to me that they may get better after the old Queue is cleaned out.
h2g2 may someday give back a modified "Submit" button to us, and often will the trade off be a longer wait to have entries customized again? Only time will tell.
The Fellow Review process is basically run by volunteers. For this reason, it is in everyone's best interests to keep the volunteers content.
You can think of this as to some extent an unselfish act. But it is partly selfish as well. Your staffers are more likely to look kindly upon your future submissions when they have been good memories of dealing with you in the past. lultimo stato settentrionale di passare uno statuto abolizione So let's look at how you can accomplish this sense of excellent will.
The Scouts decide which articles will make it to the Revised Guide. From the massive bafflement that is the current Peer Critique page, they must pick the Mye av dette materialet var gips best blog posts on various topics for being featured NotfallKreis DiensteManager  22 on h2g2's main web site.
The most important way to help the Scouts is usually to properly submit your admission to the Peer Review web site. I wrote about how to accomplish this on August 14th, and you could read the article here.
You may also help the Scouts by organizing your current entry in a sensical manner, with section headers that are easy to understand. This helps the Scout scan your own entry quickly to determine the general gist of your subject, to enable them met uitzondering van een of twee jaar  17 to form a quick first thoughts and opinions before diving down into your entry's specifics.
You should avoid using unconventional background and text colors for the entry, because different Scouts are going to have their skin preferences established differently. You wouldn't want your permission to access be unreadable because it is the incorrect color, would you?
You can also complete the Scouts a huge favor by making guaranteed your entry follows the foundations set forth by h2g2. Your entry should definitely fulfill everything established in the Writing Guidelines web page.
Finally, do yourself and also the Scouts a favor by making sure you aren't duplicating a subject someone else already has covered. Use h2g2's Power Seek function.1 Filter for your Edited Guide Entries as well as the Recommended Guide Entries. And then type your entry's subject in and click on the "Search the s historia och tar itu med problem som de flesta utvecklare skygga 27 Guide" press button.
If someone else has already registered a person's subject, you should read the other person's entry. If you feel advertising and marketing than yours, it is best to not bother the Scouts with your edition. If you think your version is way better or both versions get merit, reference the fighting entry in your submission towards Peer Review page to make your recommendation. It is possible which the two entries could be blended, and you might both get credit for the final version.
If your entry has been selected pertaining to inclusion in the Edited Tutorial, it will be forwarded to the Bass speaker Editors for a little more polishing up. The Below Editors are notoriously overworked, so they really appreciate it when a good entry passes their cubical that needs little or no effort on his or her part.
Put your entry through a spelling checker2 to eliminate annoying typing errors and foibles. Read over your individual entry a last time very, paying particular attention to any kind of incomplete sentences3 and run on lines.4
Eliminate first particular person references. The temptation is frequently high to include your personal mindset on your topic, but h2g2 is especially about information, and this needs the more distant third particular person perspective. Scan your accessibility for use of the words 'I,I 'we,' and 'us.' And then remove them. There have been very few conditions allowed on this rule, and you certainly shouldn't include these types of words in a entry you do not need subtitled 'A Personal Perspective.'
Code your page with GuideML, nevertheless keep the code clean and uncomplicated. Don't include pictures and pictures. Also, avoid Javascript add ons at all costs. They may look nice or do nifty things, but the publishers will be hard pressed to say yes to an entry that includes Javascript. We can take a closer look at proper use of GuideML next week.
Link from your admittance to other related entries in the Revised Guide where appropriate. A single good trick is to scan your entry for nouns and consider each one as a possible link. Throw out any that don't relate neatly to the topic at hand. Subsequently search the Guide should you be unsure whether any of the associated topics have been covered.
In a month's time, we'll take a look at GuideML. What is it pertaining to? Why did h2g2 design its own coding standard, instead of while using HTML standard that is widespread throughout the web? And most importantly, how may you avoid the most common GuideML errors? I am going to run through a series of tips and tricks that can set you straight in a month's time.
Opinions expressed in this gleam are my own, and do not specifically reflect the opinions regarding h2g2 or the Post.
18.2009.00. Front Page
Back Situation Page
1This is located at the top of the actual page for Alabaster skin people.2You can use Microsoft Word or Word Perfect for this, or you can ask a nitpicky friend to help. Should you have a spellchecker that looks over your own grammar as well, more's the better3Incomplete sentences are those missing either a topic or a main verb4Run on sentences include two subjects and a couple of main verbs, and are not separated by a comma, a linking expression, or a semicolon. The best way to avoid them will be to keep sentences down to one particular complete thought each.
  
   http://219.150.205.228/guestbook.asp
  
   http://www.tonfull.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9914516
  
   http://cgi.www5c.biglobe.ne.jp/~kk_aoi/bbs/apeboard_plus.cgi/
  
   http://www.88822.com/#03666/read.php?tid=980
  
   http://bestgfx.biz/joomla/52833-joomlabamboo-jb-newscycle-for-joomla-25.html
[url=http://lj-models.com/js/byrtlog.asp?page=105]B Corp on vapaaehtoinen sertif
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /3 下一条

Archiver|手机版|翔迷社区[FlyFan Forum]  

GMT+8, 2024-5-8 08:56 , Processed in 0.075318 second(s), 24 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表