翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with  a flying dream]

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 826|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

both private and non-private 31

[复制链接]

8

主题

8

帖子

69

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
69
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-9-28 02:56:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
It's not pretty, but bumping off your leader is definitely not new   just ask A2z tony Abbott.
Months of poor ballot numbers. Colleagues fed up with being sidelined or humiliated. Party with a standstill over a major plan. And then it all boils above when a number of senior MPs swap positions. The numbers promoting the leader crumble away with a couple of days and a prominent frontbencher who had previously been supporting that leader takes control. Relieved at the change, the party locks in behind the new boss.
Seem familiar? It should, because we've seen that script played out not once but twice in the past more effective months: within the government the other day and within the opposition at the start of last summer. Julia Gillard and A2z tony Abbott go to the 2010 election together with blood on their hands   not a whole lot, but some.
Big deal. Politics is actually a brutal, often grimy, morally dubious business. To rise to the very top, you have to make compromises and be in a position to hurt others   more often than not people you work with, rather than those you choose to work against   while also coming up with methods to dance around the truth any time self interest demands.
Gillard's move into the Prime Minister's chair at Kevin Rudd's price has prompted the foreseeable expressions of squeamishness from elements of the media and the community. Some sort of political leader getting it inside neck courtesy of his friends makes for ugly viewing.
Yet it's not something new; it is when old as politics. Abbott's line about Rudd being taken out by some sort of Sussex Street death squad   some sort of reference to the ALP's Right faction in New south wales   is clever, but if he's trying to suggest this is newer, pernicious development within Labor, he is way off.
(By the way, your Opposition Leader has also in who lost his  her 69 year old mother 28 past times few days claimed personal credit for destroying Rudd, while insisting that Rudd did not deserve to be dispatched so expeditiously.)
The NSW Ideal was vital The painful strike surprised her 71 in the installation of Labor's most successful leader, Bob Hawke, briefly before the 1983 election. As soon as Hawke's political viability was tired eight years later, essential members of the faction shifted to Chris Keating. And in 2006, their unification base deserted Kim Beazley along with behind Rudd.
What took place a couple weeks ago was what has been taking place within the ALP throughout its very long history. It is still a party built upon the base of its allied unions. To varying degrees, the leaders of those marriage wield influence within the get together because, through the affiliation costs they pay each year to hold the ALP going, they have a position in the party's fortunes.
They can't control MPs but they expect to be heard. Voters can, of course, make your mind up whether they think it is a shocking point with no place in modern national politics. But it's worth recalling that just three years ago, ik ben groot the Labor Party's direct union links played a vital part in leading to the election of the Rudd authorities through the ACTU's ''Your Rights at Work'' strategy.
Back then, the ACTU ALP nexus had been plugged into the political zeitgeist, or maybe at the very least the swinging voters who have been crucial to deciding the outcome in the 2007 election. The Work movement then won standard praise for reflecting public opinion.
The apocalyptic talk about each and every Labor leader from now on getting hostage to two consecutive bad thoughts and opinions polls suggests a wilful forget for the reality of national healthcare. This is not to suggest for a moment of which opinion polls, both public and private, did not play a big function in killing off Rudd's direction. They did.
But the caucus's self-confidence in Rudd was destroyed by much more than polling. The public blowback on Rudd out of late March onwards seemed to be devastating. Labor MPs could not visit anywhere without being assailed by voters exactly who wanted to talk about their decrease in confidence in the then pm.
Rudd grew deaf to every words of advice he received about how to regain the party's fortunes. This parliamentary leader of a movement which has survived since the 19th century lower himself off from the lower actually gets to of that movement and then opened up the drawbridges at each level of the particular party. First it was the actual caucus, then it was the cabinet then, in his final weeks on the top bar, his deputy. Rather than asking Gillard specifically if she was just after his job, he directed an aide to ask caucus associates if they were thinking of deserting your pet. This rendered the government unworkable.
Gillard wouldn't seriously contemplate moving next to Rudd until Tuesday of the other day. Even on the following day, whenever news of Rudd's behind the scenes soundings grew to become public, Gillard was undecided.
Even though several right wing MPs have been colorado 38 agitating for her to seek a leak against Rudd, it was not until 12 o'clock last Wednesday nights, after a three hour getting together with between Gillard and Rudd, that she stated she would run and the volumes were counted.
The caucus eventually left Rudd behind. Shortly after midnight, in advance of every MP had announced a position, Gillard had already properly secured a firm 70 of a achievable 112 votes. This shift involving sentiment does not come about particularly because of a few opinion tests or because some factional game enthusiasts throw their weight around; it had been a wholesale desertion based on a blend of factors.
The interaction associated with politics and public message is incredibly complex. Leaders usually are central, but effective leadership is vital. When a majority of voters sway behind a party, many are voting for any leader, but most are voting to get a type of national leadership. Celebrities count, but the leader with the exceptional (or her) team   their job ethic, their policies, their ability to keep open a chat with the public   are critical. When effective leadership dead, the extinguishment of the leader practices soon after.
I'm sick and tired of Labour and Liberals obsessions with polls and attempting to base policies pertaining to governing our country for opinion polls. This selection i'm voting for the greens because at least they actually have a number of principles that they stick to.
  
   http://www.yzjs.gov.cn/E_GuestBook.asp
  
   http://www.ubacs.com.ar/osqa/preguntas/2054202/the-woman-said-08
  
   http://gutenberg.imotor.com/viewthread.php?tid=433340&extra=
  
   http://51wangtuan.com/discuz/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=10271
  
   http://www.youdeguoji.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=6047815&fromuid=99906
[url=http://aklider.com.tr/css/tabs/base.asp?s=39]zou vaak liever omgaan met een
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /3 下一条

Archiver|手机版|翔迷社区[FlyFan Forum]  

GMT+8, 2024-5-8 22:56 , Processed in 0.101522 second(s), 26 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表