翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with  a flying dream]

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 968|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Andrew Richards 23

[复制链接]

7

主题

7

帖子

47

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
47
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-10-6 03:45:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
There is no reliable or constant evidence that wind farms directly cause human medical problems, a major draft review by simply Australia's leading medical research body finds.
The hotly anticipated study by the National Health and Medical Exploration Council, has also called for additional research into the issue following it identified only a small amount of studies into the issue them deemed credible enough that need considering under the review.
Anti wind flow farm campaigners claim turbines can result in a wide range of ailments including, problems, insomnia, and dizziness, from time to time dubbing the symptoms as "wind farm affliction."
These have been widely rejected by the industry and several public health researchers.
In late 2012 the council started off reviewing the published technology into the health claims.
Us president of the research council, Mentor Warwick Anderson, said it had been a high quality and systematic review. He said more modern published studies would even be considered in the council's final information due in coming many months.
The review considered research in noise, shadow flicker along with electromagnetic radiation from turbines found no conclusive evidence of any direct health effects readily available sources. It also found wind flow farm noise was improbable to be heard from distances over and above 500 to 1500 metres.
The review did find some regular evidence, albeit of bad quality, that living close to some sort of wind farms was related to "annoyance".
It also found less consistent evidence proximity to a wind flow farm was associated with snooze loss and poorer well being.
But the review stresses that finding does not mean wind farm proximity causes annoyance, and could be rather the result of other factors or perhaps study selection bias.
Easy chair of the council's expert reference group on wind farms and also health, Professor Bruce Armstrong, claimed what constituted "annoyance" was defined by your respondents of the studies.
He explained annoyance might not be the result of primary factors   such as noise   and also indirect issues   such as the visual impact of a wind farmville farm   could be the cause. He said it turned out hard through the studies to be able to disentangle the contributing factors.
"It is not essentially noise, it could be the visual impact of the wind farms that causes the annoyance. Therefore the annoyance may in fact trigger people to not be able to sleep," he said.
Through its books review the council researchers determined 2850 published works and gotten 506 public submissions, but deemed only seven studies to be of high enough quality to generally be nessuna delle avvertenze sembra esistere oggi No 1 included in the council's review.
Professor Anderson states that the council is preparing a targeted call for study on wind farms and also human health to address evidence gaps.
The research review appeared to be welcomed by the du kan spise En række fødevarer let kunne fremkalde din dårlig ånde  35 industry. Professional manager at wind strength operator Pacific Hydro, Andrew Richards, said the company was pleased with the initial findings and it had reaffirmed it has the confidence the technology was protected for residents and staff members.
Friends of the Earth campaigner Leigh Ewbank said the learning had shown once again blowing wind farms were "clean and safe".
Us president of anti wind farmville farm group the Waubra Foundation Darlene Laurie said the review had not provided more recent studies, and considered necessary a direct investigation into the "full range of acoustic measurements on the inside people's homes" to "determine why individuals out to 10 kilometres are generally reporting recurrent sleep disturbance and other symptoms which link directly with Au moins une fois operating wind flow turbines".
The Abbott government has already devoted to further study on wind farming and health, promising to ascertain a research program under the exploration council or an independent pro panel. The government has also offered to implement real time monitoring associated with wind farm noise.
This is the second significant look at the situation by the research council. Any "rapid zijn gewoon gek   60 review" it published in 2010 come to the conclusion there was insufficient published medical evidence to link wind generators with adverse health side effects.
  
   http://www.kamfaiwongs.com/shownews.asp?id=83
  
   http://7home.info/viewthread.php?tid=142188&extra=
  
   http://www.zltxyjdbsc.gov.cn/E_GuestBook.asp
  
   http://www.51bo.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=12594
  
   http://cgi.www5f.biglobe.ne.jp/mica-style/bbs/aska.cgi
Vancouver[url=ht
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /3 下一条

Archiver|手机版|翔迷社区[FlyFan Forum]  

GMT+8, 2024-5-20 09:32 , Processed in 0.107108 second(s), 24 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表