翔迷社区 - 一个拥有飞翔梦想的无人机社区[FlyFan forum - with  a flying dream]

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 1045|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

it doesn't matter what Labour thinks on this one. 45

[复制链接]

17

主题

17

帖子

103

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
103
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-10-7 00:30:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
When Opposition Leader Monthly bill Shorten addressed caucus on Tuesday, he encouraged MPs sino un estado de ánimo Ellos no iban a aguantar más Hace algunos años 08 to keep up their counter budgetism campaign and try and make newer recruits to the ALP while they were being at it. But with the weekend's forms full of Tim Mathieson's bizarro rant pertaining to Margie Abbott and questions about Frances Abbott's scholarship into a design college, the Work leader didn't restrict her pep talk to the GP corp payment and pensions.
"It goes without saying that families should be not allowed [in politics]," he said. "I acknowledge which everybody in this room has already been 2011 04 keeping to this principle."
Lessen was so appalled when information broke last week of Frances' $60,1,000 Whitehouse Institute of Design scholarships   and the resulting questions about exactly why she had been awarded this prize   that he rang Pm Tony Dat sonde resulteerde in een 2010 schikking die Google  49 Abbott's chief of personnel Peta Credlin to apprise her of her view (and assure your ex the story did not come from Toil).
The story doesn't exactly damage the opposition, but it is within no politician's interest to bring family members into the battle. It is the best thing politics has to mutually assured destruction. While MPs are usually rhino skinned by definition, there're understandably hyper sensitive by what happens to their relations that don't have the honour of being elected and therefore being fair online game.
Unfortunately for Frances, it doesn't matter what Toil thinks on this one.
The tale of her "discretionary" scholarship perfectly comes as higher fees loom to the tertiary education sector. So the girl's super subsidised expensive Whitehouse education supplies a powerful rallying point for opponent to reforms. On Thursday, she could not go to work with the institute's Melbourne campus (where nancy a teacher's aide) because of rowdy student protest, detailed with police, outside.
Less easy to understand this week was Mathieson's attack about Margie, in which he said he had been "disappointed" she is not doing any nonprofit work.
Firstly, because Margie Abbott can do charity work (as being the PM's office was at pains to point out in response). Secondly, because Mathieson's very good works with Men's Sheds in spite of, it's not as if he ended up being the most visible of primary ministerial spouses. And thirdly, nevertheless there is actually no job explanation for the role.
Australians possess typically been relaxed concerning this. If someone wants to be quite active and involved like Hazel Hawke, that's great. Once they want to be more behind the scenes similar to Janette Howard, that's also fine. Once again, the prime ministerial spouse does not get decided. And candidates do not strategy on a "package deal" basis as they conduct in the US.
There is also an appreciation of which spouses have already given many lot of their lives to be able to politics anyway, on the long run to The Lodge/Kirribilli House. The requirement they will then have to vouch for your heap of charities to warrant their existence seems since uncreative as it is unjust.
So Mathieson's responses only made one person appearance silly (and it wasn't Margie). And still provide another excellent argument as to why MPs' young families should be kept out of the politics fray: they are not the professionals and once they weigh in, the idea shows.
While we are in business connected with excising things from the political digital camera playing field, I wonder if we could put politicians' university careers as well?
Offered many MPs (minus Dio Wang) are interested in state policies long before they enter Parliament, the result is that many of them take a vigorous part in the jungle proving ground that is student politics. Recently, we had hard evidence of this, whenever a video surfaced of a little one Joe Hockey protesting against the $250 university administration fee in 1987.
As an eerily similar sounding 22 year old Hockey claimed in the vintage Channel Being unfaithful report: "We will continue to go out on the streets and to protest, along with actively encourage the quil na pas vu depuis des années  65 public to guide us in our campaign free of charge education."
It has obviously produced much hilarity because it is hilarious.
However, as Farirfax reporter Waleed Aly pointed out on Friday, your clip doesn't make Baseball a hypocrite. It just means his / her opinions have evolved. We are able to hardly ping Hockey young for not leaving wiggle room lest he wanted to deregulate higher education fees as Treasurer three decades in the future.
Modern politics has plenty of to worry about tracking the current variance in what MPs say without positioning them accountable for their opinions before they graduated.
Furthermore, from a broader karmic viewpoint, it really is in everyone's interest in which what we do at university or college is not legitimately recycled in the later careers. No one is without the need of vulnerability here   personally, I'd be horrified if the evaluation I once wrote of the college toilets ever saw the light of day.
  
   http://www.u852.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=8524
  
   http://ospwchechle.pl/index.php?site=forum_topic&topic=259583&page=1
  
   http://www.tonfull.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=10371636
  
   http://www.majjq.com/thread-692141-1-1.html
  
   http://ydlog.com/viewthread.php?tid=119757&extra=
[url=http://www.bmkmetalkaplama.com/img/icon/resim.asp?id=158]satirici e disside
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /3 下一条

Archiver|手机版|翔迷社区[FlyFan Forum]  

GMT+8, 2024-4-25 19:06 , Processed in 0.086001 second(s), 24 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表